ArticlesImplementation of guidelines for management of possible multidrug-resistant pneumonia in intensive care: an observational, multicentre cohort study
Introduction
Hospital-acquired pneumonia is one of the most common nosocomial infections. Its high morbidity and mortality and associated long and costly hospital stays have been attributed in part to delayed use of effective antibiotics because of increasing antimicrobial resistance.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Culture-guided corrections to initially inadequate antimicrobial treatment strategies do not reduce death rates,8, 10, 11, 12 and prompt treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia with broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics is therefore recommended.13
The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) published updated guidelines13 for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia and related infections in 2005. In these guidelines, the choice of empirical treatment is determined by whether patients have recognised risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens. Patients at risk include not only those with late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia, but also those with other health-care-associated pneumonias. This group includes patients who have been in hospital for 2 days or more in the preceding 90 days; reside in a nursing home or extended-care facility; receive chronic dialysis, home infusion therapy, or home wound care; have a family member infected with a multidrug-resistant organism or live in a community with a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance; recently received systemic antibiotics; or have an immunosuppressive disease or receive immunosuppression therapy.13
For patients at risk of infection with a multidrug-resistant pathogen, the guidelines13 recommend empirical treatment with the following drugs: an antipseudomonal cephalosporin, carbapenem, or β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor; an aminoglycoside or antipseudomonal fluoroquinolone; and linezolid or vancomycin. These guidelines support the development of protocols for initial empirical antibiotic therapy to increase the likelihood of adequate coverage14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and suggest antibiotic selection should be tailored to local patterns of susceptibility.
The ATS and IDSA explicitly recognise the need for guideline validation. As part of this validation, we created an initiative to improve performance in intensive-care units called Improving Medicine through Pathway Assessment of Critical Therapy in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (IMPACT-HAP). We aimed to assess the relation between guideline compliance and outcomes for patients in intensive care with multidrug-resistant pneumonia.
Section snippets
Patients
IMPACT-HAP was a multicentre initiative aimed at improving the care for patients with pneumonia in an intensive-care unit implemented in four academic medical centres in the USA: University of Louisville Medical Center (Louisville, KY), the Ohio State University Medical Center (Columbus, OH), Henry Ford Health System (Detroit, MI), and the University of Miami and Jackson Memorial Hospital (Miami, FL).
Adult patients (≥18 years of age) in participating intensive-care units were eligible for
Results
413 patients with pneumonia were in the IMPACT-HAP database. 303 had risk factors for multidrug-resistant pneumonia and were eligible for this analysis, and most required mechanical ventilation during their disease course (figure 1). All patients satisfying criteria for health-care-associated pneumonia also satisfied criteria for hospital-acquired pneumonia. 129 patients received guideline-compliant13 empirical antibiotic treatment, whereas 174 patients received non-compliant treatment. Reasons
Discussion
In our cohort study, compliance with the ATS–IDSA guidelines13 was associated with increased mortality.
Present recommendations13 for management of pneumonia in patients at risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens call for prompt broad-spectrum empirical treatment. This recommendation is supported by the consistent finding that delaying of effective antibiotic therapy is associated with increased mortality.5, 8, 10 The ATS–IDSA guidelines recommend that patients at risk should initially receive a
References (34)
- et al.
The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting
Chest
(2000) - et al.
Clinical importance of delays in the initiation of appropriate antibiotic treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia
Chest
(2002) - et al.
Inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infections: a risk factor for hospital mortality among critically ill patients
Chest
(1999) - et al.
Impact of BAL data on the therapy and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia
Chest
(1997) - et al.
Antimicrobial therapy escalation and hospital mortality among patients with health-care-associated pneumonia: a single-center experience
Chest
(2008) - et al.
Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine
Chest
(1992) - et al.
A randomized controlled trial of an antibiotic discontinuation policy for clinically suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia
Chest
(2004) - et al.
Arrhythmias associated with fluoroquinolone therapy
Int J Antimicrob Agents
(2007) - et al.
Health and economic outcomes of the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Enterobacter species
Arch Intern Med
(2002) - et al.
Impact of appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy on the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia
Intensive Care Med
(2001)
Impact of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis
Crit Care Med
Inadequate antimicrobial treatment: an important determinant of outcome for hospitalized patients
Clin Infect Dis
Guidelines for preventing health-care-associated pneumonia, 2003: recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee
MMWR Recomm Rep
Modification of empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit. ICU-Acquired Pneumonia Study Group
Intensive Care Med
The influence of mini-BAL cultures on patient outcomes: implications for the antibiotic management of ventilator-associated pneumonia
Chest
Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
A randomized, prospective evaluation of an interventional program to discontinue intravenous antibiotics at two tertiary care teaching institutions
Pharmacotherapy
Cited by (198)
Timing and Spectrum of Antibiotic Treatment for Suspected Sepsis and Septic Shock: Why so Controversial?
2022, Infectious Disease Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Similar retrospective studies of 2,198 CAP patients in four US EDs, and a second VA cohort of 15,071 nonsevere pneumonia patients, showed increased mortality associated with broad-spectrum antibiotics.45,46 A prospective cohort study of 303 ICU patients at risk for multidrug-resistant (MDR) pneumonia noted that guideline-directed (broader) therapy was associated with increased mortality.47 Regarding infections other than pneumonia, a 2-year quasi-experimental before-and-after observational cohort study of surgical ICU admissions at one hospital found that implementation of a conservative strategy for antimicrobial treatment, where antibiotics were started only after cultures or gram stain supported an infection, was associated with reduced mortality when compared with an aggressive strategy where broad empiric antimicrobials were started upon clinical suspicion and then stopped if cultures and gram stains were negative.48
Sepsis and Septic Shock
2021, Perioperative Medicine: Managing for Outcome, Second EditionA multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for antibiotic stewardship in suspected pneumonia
2020, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
- ‡
Members listed at end of paper